rackmount: (Default)
[personal profile] rackmount
100 albums you should remove from your collection immediately.

This project marks the first time Jaguaro.org is giving back to the community -- something we intend to do a lot of. We would like to offer you and the rest of the world nothing more than the gift of good taste, which some people can feel threatened by. However, though many of us wear spectacles and look both ways before crossing the street, we at Jaguaro.org are a warlike bunch. We feel that it's imperative to tell you that we are offended by your CD collection.

But we have no intention of recommending hot new CDs you should play -- we trust you and know that you'll make great decisions about which albums to buy in the future. No, we have our sights locked on the CDs that you already have. We understand that from time to time, people make mistakes and we sincerely want to help excise the guilt of a pretentious, over-hyped, and simply bad music collection from your life. More importantly, we're going to help you turn your purchasing mistakes into cold, hard cash!

In the main, we have not selected easy targets for removal -- we know that you know that the Milli Vanilli album you've got stashed away in a shoebox isn't exactly kosher. Nope, we chose critical darlings and must-have releases from the past and present. Some will bristle at our audacity for questioning the worth of any Beatles release or blithely pissing on Jane's Addiction's "masterpiece." Some will maintain that we're not qualified or that we'll never make an album as great as Dark Side of the Moon and accordingly should shut our traps. The approval an artist seeks by releasing an album is not guaranteed, even if music moguls, "tastemakers," and critics agree that it is merited. As music listeners, we've taken on the very modest project of flipping through our collections, listening to them, and separating the good stuff from the bad. If the creators of the "greats," the "classics," and the "hits" want to ensure that their efforts get the praise they deserve forevermore, they should take care that they are only accessible to sympathetic critics and fans.

The entries on this list fall roughly into three categories:


Critically bullet-proof artifacts whose weighty presence on the shelf is complimented perfectly by their perpetual absence from the CD player. Critic-mandated vanity archives should be bundled up and spirited off to the used record store under the cover of night.

Albums by new artists that have only their newness and the marketing efforts of music conglomerates to recommend them. Almost invariably, these recordings pale in comparison to those of the artists they imitate. Alternately, new albums by established artists that are slavishly hailed as the big comeback get high points with us. Like nature hates a vacuum, Jaguaro despises the Next Big Thing.

Nostalgic favorites that maintain their place by tradition and neglect more than actual merit. These are the CDs people never get rid of because they may want to play them some time in the indefinite future (certainly not now).
We assembled this list with the help of many discerning people whose musical dark nights of the soul resulted in selling trips to the used record store and even the destruction of offending albums. Some contributors went so far as to level threats against other contributors whose entries were deemed inaccurate or offensive. We admire and encourage all such behavior. Contributors include Deborah Scherer, Peter Gorsuch, Sarah Pearson, William Chace, The Reverend Spenser Hoyt, Leviticus Sloan, Jimothy Jackilus, Azdak, Duchess, John Hoole, Betty Cruikshank, Dr. Evil, Chris Shymko, Jud Richards, and Pat Hutchins.

The entries are conveniently ranked according to the level of priority that removing them from your collection should take. Though the final list is not exhaustive, make no mistake -- it is definitive. Please drop us an e-mail and share with us how removing these albums from your collection has changed your life!

continued...

Ha! great!

Date: 2002-07-29 12:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] womanonfire.livejournal.com
i might take their advice about a few of these.

Re: Ha! great!

Date: 2002-07-29 12:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofrepose.livejournal.com
tell me about it. i could use 3 fewer beastie boys CDs

Date: 2002-07-29 12:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sadotter.livejournal.com
What does it say about me that I have 12 of them in my collection? And that I like and listen to most of them? And that I'd take Rush's "Moving Pictures" if someone gave it to me?

Date: 2002-07-29 12:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofrepose.livejournal.com
i'd give it to you, but a)i dont have it and b) you'd probably like it too much. and then id have to feel embarrassed to like you.

Re:

Date: 2002-07-29 12:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sadotter.livejournal.com
So you're saying it's true that no girls like Rush?

Date: 2002-07-30 11:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofrepose.livejournal.com
not only is it true that girls dont like rush, but girls dont like boys who like rush. make a note, next time you dont get laid. :)

Re:

Date: 2002-07-31 09:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sadotter.livejournal.com
Come to think of it, there was a severe dearth of women at the Rush concert. Not too many wedding rings on the guys either.

Date: 2002-07-29 12:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iscari0t.livejournal.com
well if you asked them, they'd probably call you a hippie and a follower for liking "waking life." if you asked me, i'd say who gives a shit, because while being aloof and pretentious toward all things is funny as hell to watch (and even do, at times,) the trick is to remember that everyone is completely full of shit, so dont listen to any of them. anyone who genuinely believes that they have a clue what's really going on is laughable. but opinions are hilarious. =)


-special-

Re:

Date: 2002-07-29 12:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sadotter.livejournal.com
God, I couldn't stand "Waking Life." Trust me, I'm never full of shit.

Date: 2002-07-29 12:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iscari0t.livejournal.com
see what i mean? hahahahhahahahaha!!

-special-

Date: 2002-07-29 12:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iscari0t.livejournal.com
ps moving pictures actually did kinda suck. if you have to get a rush album, get permanent waves or hemispheres.

-special-

Re:

Date: 2002-07-29 12:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sadotter.livejournal.com
OK, full disclosure: as hard as it is to believe, there was once a period in my life when I wasn't quite the paragon of cool that I am now. Some might even say I was a big dork. In fact, some would question if anything has changed. But, yes, there was a time when I had all the Rush albums on tape, including "2112," "Permanent Waves," "Hemispheres," "Moving Pictures," and more. I even saw them on the "Roll the Bones" tour. Man, nothing like cutting class in high school to go down to ticketmaster to get Rush tix!

And somehow I got on a group email where my friends are dissecting "Vapor Trails," or, as they call it, "Skid Marks."

Sorry to hijack your post and turn it into a Rush sounding board. I completely apologize.

Date: 2002-07-30 11:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofrepose.livejournal.com
actually it's probably a welcome hiatus from my completely full of shit journal. gotta mix it up, i say. rush, be damned.

everyone's got her skeletons. you may have read about mine a few posts back, with my guilty pleasures music list.

eep

Date: 2002-08-01 01:31 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Gad, I laughed I cried. No Cure or Depeche Mode. What gives? How can you have Morissey and Love and Rockets without Depeche Mode and the Cure?

Now I feel better about myself.

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 27th, 2025 09:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios